Are the Jews committing Genocide?

Imagine we had a time machine. We go back to the 1930s and 1940s. Would you tell the world's press about the Nazi Holocaust going on in Germany? Maybe try to save a few million lives? 

Well, guess what? It looks like we have an opportunity to do something like that right now!

On October 7th of last year, we were all appalled when the Hamas terrorists attacked innocent Jews in the Gaza border. That was bad. 

But Israel has since overreacted. If they keep it up, they will wipe out the innocent Palestinians living on the Gaza Strip. 

Ironically, this time, it's not the Nazis, but the Jews committing genocide. The blood of all those Holocaust victims are crying out from their graves, "Stop! Stop the killing of the Innocents!". The IDF is killing children.

Extermination of these innocent civilians might solve Israel's Palestinian problem once and for all, but it's a little much, don't you think?

Just Google it. Search YouTube. The evidence is all there. 

What should we do about it? Can President Trump influence President Netanyahu? I think he can, and he should. Maybe we could write a letter? Share a post? Make a call?

Something. 

But let's not sit on the sidelines this time.

Here's what I found with a simple Google AI Search:

Is there clear documented irrefutable evidence Israel commits genocide

Whether there is "clear documented irrefutable evidence" that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza is a subject of intense international debate, with differing conclusions from various legal experts, international organizations, and state actors. [1, 2]

Key points:

  • International Court of Justice (ICJ) Proceedings: The ICJ is currently hearing a case brought by South Africa, which accuses Israel of violating the 1948 Genocide Convention. In a January 2024 provisional ruling, the ICJ found it "plausible" that Israel's actions could fall within the provisions of the Convention and ordered Israel to take all measures within its power to prevent acts of genocide and allow humanitarian aid into Gaza. This was an interim step to preserve the case's merits for a final ruling, which could take years, and was not a final verdict on whether genocide has occurred.
  • UN Commission of Inquiry Findings: A recent independent, international commission of inquiry established by the UN Human Rights Council concluded in a September 2025 report that Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. The commission cited statements by Israeli officials as "direct evidence of genocidal intent" and a pattern of conduct, including mass killings, the weaponization of food, and the targeting of essential infrastructure, as circumstantial evidence. This finding is not a binding legal ruling, but provides significant evidence that courts and prosecutors can rely on.
  • Differing Legal Views:
    • Accusations of Genocide: Alongside the UN commission, the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) and several international NGOs, including Amnesty International, have stated that Israel's actions meet the legal definition of genocide. They point to the high civilian death toll, the widespread destruction, the blockade of aid, and dehumanizing statements by some Israeli leaders as evidence of genocidal intent.
    • Counterarguments: Israel vehemently rejects the allegations as "baseless" and a "blood libel," arguing its actions are in self-defense against Hamas and aims to dismantle the group's capabilities. Some international law experts, while acknowledging potential war crimes like using hunger as a weapon, argue there is no "irrefutable" or clear proof of the specific intent to destroy the Palestinian people as a group, which is a key legal requirement for a genocide conviction.
  • Evidence and Enforcement: The "irrefutable" nature of evidence is a legal standard that would need to be proven in court. While significant documentation has been presented by various bodies, Israel disputes the context and interpretation of this evidence. ICJ rulings, while legally binding, do not have a hard enforcement mechanism, and whether any action will be taken depends on how other states, particularly allies, respond. [1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]
In summary, major international legal and academic bodies argue that there is substantial evidence, including direct and circumstantial proof, to support the claim of genocide, but a definitive, universally accepted legal verdict has not been reached, and the characterization remains highly contentious. [12, 14]



AI responses may include mistakes.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to pay off the Federal debt

If the federal government sold all federal lands back to the States, we could pay off the federal debt.  Overnight.  Our founding fathers never envisioned, nor did they allow in the Constitution, the federal government to own land, except for the Capitol. And a good case could be made today for our military bases.  Our state conservation leaders could steward our precious National Parks, BLM land, etc. just as well as the federal conservationists. In fact, they likely can do it better. The closer the overseers are to the overseen, the better.  It's not rocket science. It's common sense.
Read more

Sin

We all have it.  We all do it.  It will send us all to Hell. It's where we all deserve to go, because of it. But God has provided a solution. His name is Jesus Christ. John 3:16 “For this is how God loved the world: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life." As was the slogan with Tug McGraw and the '69 Mets, "Yah Gotta Believe!" Are you a believer? If not, believe in Him today. He will not only change your eternal destiny, but He will change your life! You will never be the same again.
Read more